| ??? 03/11/07 09:38 Read: times |
#134705 - Checksum? CRC? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
How about including a checksum or CRC, and having your code verify that?
As this is unproven hardware, I think you should go for the CRC rather than a simple checksum... |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 8051 board somewhat working | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Give us a clue then.How does it partialy work?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| HC AC ???? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you will most likely need pullups | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| pull ups | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| be more specific | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| interesting tests | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| interesting they may be, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| to verify | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| interesting they may be, | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Checksum? CRC? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| hmm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You probably need an oscilloscope | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sorry for asking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not the first... (or last :-) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maybe my naging helped ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why EPP? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why epp can be faster | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Epp requires a bit less logic and is WAY faster | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| about that schematic ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a matter of taste | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I have to agree ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
you may not have discovered this | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you have to investigate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| indeed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Amazed! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What? | 01/01/70 00:00 |