Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
03/11/07 09:15
Modified:
  03/11/07 09:27

Read: times


 
#134703 - interesting they may be,
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Mike Stegmaier said:
The only way I can verify the eeprom with the circuit is to disable the reset. (MANR is high).

I even tried somple code, like this:

mov DPTR,FF00h
mov A,38h
movx @dptr,A


This code is supposed to make the LCD go blank as soon as the reset pin on the microprocessor goes low.

Remember, this circuit is supposed to let me program the EEPROM and use it without removing it.


but you stil failed to answer following:

have you been able to read your eeprom and verify that what you think you wrote to it, is actually present in the EEPROM?

Please don't tell me you cannot remove your EEPROM from your circuit...

Failing any other test method, you can always drive the address lines manualy and verify the code presented at the data lines. (ie single stepping your code in the eeprom).
You will have to verify each programmed location to see if it matches what you want it to be.

Well, the above would be what I would do next.

regards

Patrick

List of 27 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
8051 board somewhat working            01/01/70 00:00      
   Give us a clue then.How does it partialy work??            01/01/70 00:00      
   HC AC ????            01/01/70 00:00      
   you will most likely need pullups            01/01/70 00:00      
      pull ups            01/01/70 00:00      
   be more specific            01/01/70 00:00      
      interesting tests            01/01/70 00:00      
         interesting they may be, but            01/01/70 00:00      
            to verify            01/01/70 00:00      
               interesting they may be,            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Checksum? CRC?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     hmm            01/01/70 00:00      
                        You probably need an oscilloscope            01/01/70 00:00      
   sorry for asking            01/01/70 00:00      
      not the first... (or last :-)            01/01/70 00:00      
   Maybe my naging helped ...            01/01/70 00:00      
      why EPP?            01/01/70 00:00      
         why epp can be faster            01/01/70 00:00      
         Epp requires a bit less logic and is WAY faster            01/01/70 00:00      
         about that schematic ...            01/01/70 00:00      
            a matter of taste            01/01/70 00:00      
               I have to agree ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  you may not have discovered this            01/01/70 00:00      
   you have to investigate            01/01/70 00:00      
      indeed            01/01/70 00:00      
   Amazed!            01/01/70 00:00      
      What?            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List