Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
03/11/07 18:44
Read: times


 
#134718 - hmm
Responding to: ???'s previous message
after further testing, I'm starting to discover that my 8051 system itself isn't working properly.

In a typical setup, if all address/data lines were tied low through resistors (mine are like that and the resistors are 10K)
and the system was running, I would think that the system would increment the program counter constantly, because the only instruction processed at each location is a NOP (instruction #0).

I'm thinking that maybe 10K resistance is too high to make the 80C51BH processor think that it is defaulted to low, but I don't want to heat the chip.

Right now, if I remove the EEPROM and only have the 80C51-BH in place, a binary count must occur at the speed of the clock. right now I have it at 8.064Mhz.

It seems now that A0 through A7 are high.

when I went through each address line I didn't see a constant transistion from high-low-high. Either one stayed high or stayed low.

My capacitors next to the crystal are 33pF each.

The crystal appears to be running according to further tests, and the reset is low.


List of 27 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
8051 board somewhat working            01/01/70 00:00      
   Give us a clue then.How does it partialy work??            01/01/70 00:00      
   HC AC ????            01/01/70 00:00      
   you will most likely need pullups            01/01/70 00:00      
      pull ups            01/01/70 00:00      
   be more specific            01/01/70 00:00      
      interesting tests            01/01/70 00:00      
         interesting they may be, but            01/01/70 00:00      
            to verify            01/01/70 00:00      
               interesting they may be,            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Checksum? CRC?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     hmm            01/01/70 00:00      
                        You probably need an oscilloscope            01/01/70 00:00      
   sorry for asking            01/01/70 00:00      
      not the first... (or last :-)            01/01/70 00:00      
   Maybe my naging helped ...            01/01/70 00:00      
      why EPP?            01/01/70 00:00      
         why epp can be faster            01/01/70 00:00      
         Epp requires a bit less logic and is WAY faster            01/01/70 00:00      
         about that schematic ...            01/01/70 00:00      
            a matter of taste            01/01/70 00:00      
               I have to agree ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  you may not have discovered this            01/01/70 00:00      
   you have to investigate            01/01/70 00:00      
      indeed            01/01/70 00:00      
   Amazed!            01/01/70 00:00      
      What?            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List