| ??? 03/13/07 20:36 Read: times |
#134915 - you may not have discovered this Responding to: ???'s previous message |
If the busses were labelled properly, i.e. contained the names of all the signals on them, it would help, though.
you may not have discovered this, but the curent version of ORCAD require buses to be labelled. If, however some schematic program allowed things like por, mqx, abs and hgt to be 'bused' I would immediately 'unbus' those if I had to work on that schematic. However e.g. D[0..7] is, in my opinion better bused than separate. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 8051 board somewhat working | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Give us a clue then.How does it partialy work?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| HC AC ???? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you will most likely need pullups | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| pull ups | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| be more specific | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| interesting tests | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| interesting they may be, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| to verify | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| interesting they may be, | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Checksum? CRC? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| hmm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You probably need an oscilloscope | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sorry for asking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not the first... (or last :-) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maybe my naging helped ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why EPP? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why epp can be faster | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Epp requires a bit less logic and is WAY faster | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| about that schematic ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a matter of taste | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I have to agree ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
you may not have discovered this | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you have to investigate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| indeed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Amazed! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What? | 01/01/70 00:00 |