| ??? 04/25/07 07:51 Read: times Msg Score: +1 +1 Good Answer/Helpful |
#137909 - Slave comms controller? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
If it really is too much for the PC, then how about a slave controller that just does the comms to the PC and the other slave devices?
eg,
+----+ +------+
| | RS232 | 8051 | Bus
| PC +<----->+ Coms +<======+==========+==========+=====>
| | | proc | | | |
+----+ +------+ | | |
+---+--+ +---+--+ +---+--+
| 8051 | | 8051 | | 8051 |
| slave| | slave| | slave|
+------+ +------+ +------+
Or back to the previous suggestion of just adding more COM ports to your PC? |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| multiple 8052 communication with PC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RS485 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| More COM: Ports | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Further additional COM: ports | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| multiple 8052 communication with PC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Simple solution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Recipe for a short circuit? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not on a standard 8051? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| whether that is a problem is for the OP to determi | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| protocol ?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yes - no - see above | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| master slave PC performance | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| multi-GHz PC can get a lot done in a few ms! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Slave comms controller? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| expanding on th above | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| For just two devices | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| been there, done that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
In this case... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Interrupt Request? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not really | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not on a PC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not that it can't be done | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Another recipe is a ring!!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sure, if you have all the time in the world | 01/01/70 00:00 |