| ??? 04/25/07 12:25 Read: times |
#137919 - Not that it can't be done Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I think he's talking about the PC part
In my other post http://www.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=137918 I doucument the advantages of making it "Not on a PC". I may have missed that he wants to use a PC as a mmaster, simply because I would never consider such an inefficient mathod. Not that it can't be done. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| multiple 8052 communication with PC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RS485 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| More COM: Ports | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Further additional COM: ports | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| multiple 8052 communication with PC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Simple solution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Recipe for a short circuit? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not on a standard 8051? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| whether that is a problem is for the OP to determi | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| protocol ?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yes - no - see above | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| master slave PC performance | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| multi-GHz PC can get a lot done in a few ms! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Slave comms controller? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| expanding on th above | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| For just two devices | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| been there, done that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
In this case... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Interrupt Request? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not really | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not on a PC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not that it can't be done | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Another recipe is a ring!!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sure, if you have all the time in the world | 01/01/70 00:00 |