| ??? 05/24/07 02:22 Read: times |
#139712 - So much for the manual Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Not the Clearest Section, But Pages 96 - 100 in the Compiler Book
SO: WRONG char bdata bitByte; // Define a bit-addressable byte X = bitByte^6; // WRONG RIGHT char bdata bitByte; // Define a bit-addressable byte sbit bitByte_6 = bitByte^6; // Define 'X' as bit 6 within the byte X = bitByte_6; // To Use it. Right? Now does that help Shruthi |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Byte used as bit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| which compiler? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Silabs IDE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| and was this inline assembler in C-program? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No, not an assembler in C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SILabs IDE is NOT a compiler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I was just referring to the IDE used. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Terminology | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Assuming The Keil C Compiler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No, that's wrong | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| So much for the manual | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, that's it! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| assembler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| assembling not compiling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| MISC_FLAGS EQU 20h | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re:MISC_FLAGS EQU 20h | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Bytes as bits | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| stop expreimenting, read the manual | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Or use Acc | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Accurate terminology | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C51.exe | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No and definitely not | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Check Byte Address | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| i do not recall | 01/01/70 00:00 |