| ??? 05/24/07 06:08 Read: times |
#139716 - Yes, that's it! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Neil Kurzman said:
WRONG char bdata bitByte; // Define a bit-addressable byte X = bitByte^6; // WRONG RIGHT char bdata bitByte; // Define a bit-addressable byte sbit bitByte_6 = bitByte^6; // Define 'X' as bit 6 within the byte X = bitByte_6; // To Use it. Yes, that's it! Now does that help Shruthi I don't think so - I think he's talking about assembler, not 'C'...? |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Byte used as bit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| which compiler? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Silabs IDE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| and was this inline assembler in C-program? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No, not an assembler in C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SILabs IDE is NOT a compiler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I was just referring to the IDE used. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Terminology | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Assuming The Keil C Compiler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No, that's wrong | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| So much for the manual | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, that's it! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| assembler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| assembling not compiling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| MISC_FLAGS EQU 20h | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re:MISC_FLAGS EQU 20h | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Bytes as bits | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| stop expreimenting, read the manual | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Or use Acc | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Accurate terminology | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C51.exe | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No and definitely not | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Check Byte Address | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| i do not recall | 01/01/70 00:00 |