| ??? 05/24/07 12:23 Read: times |
#139740 - i do not recall Responding to: ???'s previous message |
... 29h, which is a valid address of an bit addressable byte in ram
not having done much, if any, BDATA assembly things as of late, but I do tend to remember that even if a byte is located in the bitbyte range it can not be bit acccessed if not declared in a BDATA segment. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Byte used as bit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| which compiler? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Silabs IDE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| and was this inline assembler in C-program? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No, not an assembler in C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SILabs IDE is NOT a compiler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I was just referring to the IDE used. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Terminology | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Assuming The Keil C Compiler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No, that's wrong | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| So much for the manual | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, that's it! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| assembler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| assembling not compiling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| MISC_FLAGS EQU 20h | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re:MISC_FLAGS EQU 20h | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Bytes as bits | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| stop expreimenting, read the manual | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Or use Acc | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Accurate terminology | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C51.exe | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No and definitely not | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Check Byte Address | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| i do not recall | 01/01/70 00:00 |