| ??? 08/26/08 16:28 Read: times |
#157772 - Thought process in frequency domain.. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Dear Kai,
Sorry for the delayed response. I almost thought that the thread is over and today when I checke there were replies from you and Marshall. Frankly I had to read your reply more than twice to partially understand it ! I am a guy used to think only in time domain and for me any discussion on FIR and IIR is a tad difficult to grasp. Let me ask you this : I acquire 256 samples and take a mean of them to get one sample. Now if there is a peak at the 100th sample I am going to loose that with decimation ? right ? ( For purpose of discussion assume that the peak is NOT noise .) Thanks Raghu |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Integrate decimate... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Strength reduction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| >> = Divide and << = Multiply | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Decimating | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I have also used this approach | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thought process in frequency domain.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Low-pass filter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Low pass filter selection... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sample a longer run at high frequency and analyse | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Good suggestion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| For your application... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Rooling average concept... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Moving Average Filter = Rolling Average Filter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| General concept vs. specific algorithm. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Correlated and uncorrelated noise | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Your language ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 'Synchronous'? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Similar but not identical meaning | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, sounds waayyy better... | 01/01/70 00:00 |