| ??? 08/27/08 16:45 Read: times |
#157796 - Your language ... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
.. is not the issue Kai ! In fact all your posts are very detailed and clear. The issue is my ability to grasp such topics at the first go. Sorry if my post conveyed a meaning otherwise.
Well, your explanation on the co-related and non-correlated made interesting reading and I think the effect and decimation is rather clear now. Thanks. I think when it comes to the topic of noise, one never stops learning ;-)) Raghu |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Integrate decimate... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Strength reduction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| >> = Divide and << = Multiply | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Decimating | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I have also used this approach | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thought process in frequency domain.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Low-pass filter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Low pass filter selection... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sample a longer run at high frequency and analyse | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Good suggestion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| For your application... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Rooling average concept... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Moving Average Filter = Rolling Average Filter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| General concept vs. specific algorithm. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Correlated and uncorrelated noise | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Your language ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 'Synchronous'? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Similar but not identical meaning | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, sounds waayyy better... | 01/01/70 00:00 |