| ??? 08/28/08 13:07 Modified: 08/28/08 13:08 Read: times |
#157822 - Yes, sounds waayyy better... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
David said:
I'm not a filter or mathematical expert, but synchronous makes more English sense to me than correlated. Is the latter the correct technical term or a close translation from German, Kai? We just say that the two things are "correlated", when the noise spike always occurs at the same moment relative to the start of conversion. Maybe it's even the wrong word in german... But you are right, "synchronous" sounds much better, especially if I think of the "synchronous demodulation", as another example. I just wanted to tell, that there can be noise which is synchronous to the sample and converting timing of a ADC, which can detoriate the result by always the same amount and which cannot be simply removed by a low pass filtering using subsequent samples, because all samples are contaminated by this noise in the same manner. Kai |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Integrate decimate... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Strength reduction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| >> = Divide and << = Multiply | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Decimating | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I have also used this approach | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thought process in frequency domain.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Low-pass filter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Low pass filter selection... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sample a longer run at high frequency and analyse | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Good suggestion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| For your application... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Rooling average concept... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Moving Average Filter = Rolling Average Filter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| General concept vs. specific algorithm. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Correlated and uncorrelated noise | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Your language ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 'Synchronous'? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Similar but not identical meaning | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, sounds waayyy better... | 01/01/70 00:00 |