| ??? 08/26/08 16:54 Read: times |
#157774 - Low-pass filter Responding to: ???'s previous message |
The peak will be divided by 256, so most of its effect will be lost.
You will not be able to see the difference between 256 samples that are one ADC tick higher and a single sample that is 256 ticks higher. You also have to think about the (lack of) rounding. An 8-bit ADC sample of 255 may be truncated to zero, if all other samples are zero. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Integrate decimate... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Strength reduction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| >> = Divide and << = Multiply | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Decimating | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I have also used this approach | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thought process in frequency domain.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Low-pass filter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Low pass filter selection... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sample a longer run at high frequency and analyse | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Good suggestion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| For your application... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Rooling average concept... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Moving Average Filter = Rolling Average Filter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| General concept vs. specific algorithm. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Correlated and uncorrelated noise | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Your language ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 'Synchronous'? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Similar but not identical meaning | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, sounds waayyy better... | 01/01/70 00:00 |