??? 08/28/08 09:29 Read: times |
#157815 - 'Synchronous'? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I'm not a filter or mathematical expert, but synchronous makes more English sense to me than correlated. Is the latter the correct technical term or a close translation from German, Kai?
Dave |
Topic | Author | Date |
Integrate decimate... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Strength reduction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
>> = Divide and << = Multiply | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Decimating | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I have also used this approach | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thought process in frequency domain.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Low-pass filter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Low pass filter selection... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Sample a longer run at high frequency and analyse | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Good suggestion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
For your application... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Rooling average concept... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Moving Average Filter = Rolling Average Filter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
General concept vs. specific algorithm. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Correlated and uncorrelated noise | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Your language ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
'Synchronous'? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Similar but not identical meaning | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, sounds waayyy better...![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |