| ??? 09/03/08 13:47 Read: times |
#157930 - Any further questions ? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Randall Seden said:
The response of the BBD Comb Filter was not a lowpass filter though so I guess things change a little by going to DSP versus hardware. Well, yes, technically you can also make a digital highpass comb filter, or one that just attenuates a certain frequency and its higher harmonics. But the latter will perform fairly poorly compared to more complex filter designs. All my experience has been in continuous time filter design Then you've already learned all the hard stuff! (Time/frequency representation of signals, Fourier-/LaPlace-transformation, pole/zero representations of systems, etc.). "Going digital" doesn't fundamentally change how these things work. You may want to look for more "theoretical" books than the one by Dale Grover then. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Dale Grover's DSP Microcontroller Book | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I've read it a while ago ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| MAC is nice, but good multiply often enough | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sure but ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not manufacturers but books. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Is really MAC so nice for 8bit MCU? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It\'s nicer than not having one, ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, need for MAC depends on processor size | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, a MAC is nice for 8 Bit MCU | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Comb Filter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Depends. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Bucket Brigade Comb Filter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Any further questions ? | 01/01/70 00:00 |