??? 09/05/08 06:55 Modified: 09/05/08 06:56 Read: times |
#157966 - It\'s nicer than not having one, ... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
... in which case you'd have to do 16x16->32 bit MACs with 4 MULs a whole bunch of ADD/ADDC, and that doesn't include moving the data anywhere yet. |
Topic | Author | Date |
Dale Grover's DSP Microcontroller Book | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I've read it a while ago ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
MAC is nice, but good multiply often enough | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Sure but ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not manufacturers but books. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Is really MAC so nice for 8bit MCU? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It\'s nicer than not having one, ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, need for MAC depends on processor size | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, a MAC is nice for 8 Bit MCU![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Comb Filter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Depends. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Bucket Brigade Comb Filter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Any further questions ? | 01/01/70 00:00 |