| ??? 08/24/09 12:18 Modified: 08/24/09 12:19 Read: times |
#168507 - Not possible. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Am I missing something?
No, you're not mission anything. There are no instructions for indexed bit access, pure and simple. The developers guide doesn't seem to say whether or not this is possible or give any examples of that usage. Well, the guide mostly needs to say what _is_ possible. If something isn't mentioned, then it isn't possible (or it's an "undocumented feature", a.k.a. a bug). Like indexed bit accesses. If you believe that indexed bit accesses would make your program easier to understand, you'll have to write an assembly function, e.g. one that accepts an index and sets/clears/returns the state of the bit specified by the index. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Addressing bit memory indirectly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not possible. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| so why Bit addressable memory? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sure you can and THINK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Fast and saves code and RAM space | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No such instruction... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks so much | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That's _too_ limited... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not vast - actually quite small. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| bible time | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| store bit address... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| if '2051' is the Atmel, then | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "cable" only for the "S" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I second the motion and add | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I have... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Smoking bad for the health | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| an issue many newbies are not aware of is ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| NXP??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Design flaw? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a feature | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| cheap | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Code: Addressing bit memory indirectly | 01/01/70 00:00 |