??? 08/24/09 14:47 Read: times |
#168519 - Smoking bad for the health Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Matthew Milford said:
[...]since my old programmer started smoking. Everyone knows that smoking is bad for the health, and may shorten your life ;) |
Topic | Author | Date |
Addressing bit memory indirectly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not possible. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
so why Bit addressable memory? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
sure you can and THINK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Fast and saves code and RAM space | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No such instruction... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks so much | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
That's _too_ limited... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not vast - actually quite small. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
bible time | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
store bit address... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
if '2051' is the Atmel, then | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
"cable" only for the "S" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I second the motion and add | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I have... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Smoking bad for the health | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
an issue many newbies are not aware of is ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
NXP??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Design flaw? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
a feature | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
cheap | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Code: Addressing bit memory indirectly![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |