| ??? 08/24/09 17:34 Read: times |
#168521 - an issue many newbies are not aware of is ... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
... that there is no such thing as an "universal programmer" besides the $500-up parallel units.
Arghmel have, over the uyears had, at least 5 different parallel programming methods and, if I recall 3 different serial ones. Philips/NXP seems to change parallel programming algorithm for every new chip they introduce, but have steadfastly stuck to UART for their serially programmable devices. SILabs is totally JTAG but have two different interfaces, one for the derivatives and one for the deviates. well, here is 3 examples, I could continue, but you get the point. For that very reason I recommend that all that are not "production geared" stick to UART or JTAG programmable chips. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Addressing bit memory indirectly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not possible. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| so why Bit addressable memory? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sure you can and THINK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Fast and saves code and RAM space | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No such instruction... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks so much | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That's _too_ limited... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not vast - actually quite small. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| bible time | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| store bit address... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| if '2051' is the Atmel, then | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "cable" only for the "S" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I second the motion and add | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I have... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Smoking bad for the health | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| an issue many newbies are not aware of is ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| NXP??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Design flaw? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a feature | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| cheap | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Code: Addressing bit memory indirectly | 01/01/70 00:00 |