| ??? 01/24/03 20:36 Read: times |
#37160 - RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz |
And keep in mind that in some uC (most 8052?) there is a T2 also available for baud rates, which uses a different divisor than T0 and T1. So some baud rates may be perfect or close enough with T2 and 12MHz that are not with T0 or T1 and 12Mhz. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Think clock pulses not frequency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Think clock pulses not frequency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Databook | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Databook | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Databook | 01/01/70 00:00 |