| ??? 01/25/03 13:00 Read: times |
#37247 - RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz |
Ah, No, obviously it cannot count non-integer delays. The secret is the tolerance that RS232 permits. The "Don't use " requencies mark where the error between actual baud rate and demanded baud rate is too great to use.
Steve |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Think clock pulses not frequency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Think clock pulses not frequency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Databook | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Databook | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Databook | 01/01/70 00:00 |