| ??? 01/25/03 10:51 Read: times |
#37241 - RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz |
I think you should scrap the idea of using the TUSBXXXX , get a bog standard 8051 with a bit of flash.. Then download the Bible ,or better yet ,get the Philips IC20 databook (where the bible came from)..and read it... Once you have a basic understanding of the 8051 , you can then argue your point from a position of knowledge... And what can you not divide 12000000 by ?.... |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Think clock pulses not frequency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Think clock pulses not frequency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Databook | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Databook | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Databook | 01/01/70 00:00 |