| ??? 01/25/03 12:49 Read: times |
#37246 - RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz |
But
[1]TUSBXXXXhas already been ordered [2]debug guide of this controller demostrates serial port initialisation where it is stated that SMOD for 11.0592MHz should be 0 and 1 for 24MHz and 48MHz. in addition this example gives time delatys calculation for 11.0592, 24, 48 and 96 MHz: #define BAUD4800_11059 256–(28800/4800) // 250 #define BAUD9600_11059 256–(28800/9600) // 253 #define BAUD4800_12000 256–(62500/4800) // 242.9791666 #define BAUD9600_12000 256–(62500/9600) // 249.4895833 don’t use #define BAUD9600_24000 256–(125000/9600) // 242.9791666 #define BAUD9600_48000 256–(250000/9600) // 229.9583333 #define BAUD9600_96000 256–(500000/9600) // 203.9166666 Is it OK to non-integer delays for baud rate? |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Think clock pulses not frequency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Think clock pulses not frequency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Databook | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Databook | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Databook | 01/01/70 00:00 |



