Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
01/30/03 22:46
Read: times


 
#37804 - RE: Databook
Responding to: ???'s previous message
I can only assume that the values of 30 pf for quartz and 47 pf for ceramic at f<25 MHz must provide for the desired fo as set by the crystal, whether 11.0592, 12, or 4 MHz.
Thedy do.
The oscillator inside the '51 is not tuned by any means, thus it will run at the fundamental frequency of whatever crystal you choose even if it is 32.whatever kHz (the clock crystal).

Erik

List of 20 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 11.0592MHz vs. 12MHz            01/01/70 00:00      
   Think clock pulses not frequency            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Think clock pulses not frequency            01/01/70 00:00      
         Databook            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Databook            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Databook            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List