| ??? 05/29/03 17:11 Read: times |
#46937 - RE: real problem Responding to: ???'s previous message |
You need one part in 40,000 accuracy, but you can always let a timer over flow a couple of times. This is all turning into another RPM measurement thread in essence !
Steve |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 200MHz Measure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 200MHz Measure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 200MHz Measure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 200MHz Measure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 200MHz Measure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 200MHz Measure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 200MHz Measure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 200MHz Measure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 200MHz Measure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 200MHz Measure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 200MHz Measure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| real problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: real problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: real problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: real problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: real problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: real problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: real problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: real problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: real problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: real problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: real problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: real problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: real problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: real problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: real problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: real problem | 01/01/70 00:00 |