| ??? 05/29/03 17:12 Read: times |
#46938 - RE: 200MHz Measure Responding to: ???'s previous message |
There is no decreasing of accuracy on using a prescaler. Any prescaler divide exact, e.g. by 512.
The trick, you must only count the time from one overflow until one of the next overflows. Than you are shure that exact 512, 1024, 1536 and so on pulses are gone. Peter |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 200MHz Measure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 200MHz Measure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 200MHz Measure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 200MHz Measure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 200MHz Measure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 200MHz Measure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 200MHz Measure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 200MHz Measure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 200MHz Measure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 200MHz Measure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 200MHz Measure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| real problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: real problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: real problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: real problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: real problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: real problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: real problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: real problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: real problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: real problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: real problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: real problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: real problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: real problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: real problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: real problem | 01/01/70 00:00 |



