| ??? 06/21/03 08:18 Read: times |
#48959 - RE: Port 0 (Back post) Responding to: ???'s previous message |
hi kai,
thanks for the scathing attack on my inability to express my need (i will try not to repeat the same mistake again) and for the invaluable advice. i guess lack of detail resulted in this megamess. my mistake. I do know that a pull up is not required for memory operations!! (give me a break, i am not that bad) I was using a 4k7 pullup (with TTL load) on port 0 and had no clue as to why i was using 4k7. Also to light a bicolor LED via port0 i was using a 1k pullup (Trial and error method of determination used here!!) So i was trying to figure out a logical method to calculate the pull up. (The picture is very clear now). I am truly sorry for the goofup and the resulting waste of time. About stray capacitance (Another naive question from an Electronics Student!!) I will have to consider the pin capcitance of the microcontroller and the load, but what about the copper tracks on the PCB? What if we use a general purpose board + wires (or a bread board) do the stray capacitance calculations differ now? thanks and sorry, sushil |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Port 0 (Back post) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port 0 (Back post) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port 0 (Back post) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| More details needed! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port 0 (Back post) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port 0 (Back post) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port 0 (Back post) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port 0 (Back post) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port 0 (Back post) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port 0 (Back post) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port 0 (Back post) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port 0 (Back post),erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's not your mistake, Pranav... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port 0 (Back post) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port 0 (Back post) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| copper trace capacitance | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: copper trace capacitance | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Port 0 (Back post) | 01/01/70 00:00 |



