Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
06/30/03 13:26
Read: times


 
#49695 - RE: Why not use QBASIC?
Responding to: ???'s previous message
I have programmed the PC ends of the communications links to embedded products a multitude of times. I know and have used each of Visual C++/Windows programming, Visual Basic/Windows programming, Borland C/DOS programming, and x86 Assembler/DOS. Each environment has its distinct advantages for the hostware to support the embedded product. I will come right out and say it is rediculous to flat out declare that one is better than the other based upon perceived programming discipline!!! In the instances where I have used Visual Basic it was done in consideration of various factors including:

1) Length of time to complete project
2) Ability of customer to support changes in code
3) Capability for customer to re-compile code as the OS migration path happens.

So you see, the solution is one of providing the RIGHT answer, ON TIME, in a way the customer can use it and it gets DONE.

Michael Karas


List of 35 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
URGENT: serial comuinication 8051            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: URGENT: serial comuinication 8051            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: URGENT: serial comuinication 8051            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: URGENT: serial comuinication 8051            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: URGENT: serial comuinication 8051            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: URGENT: serial comuinication 8051            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: URGENT: serial comuinication 8051            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: URGENT: serial comuinication 8051            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: URGENT: serial comuinication 8051            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: URGENT: serial comuinication 8051            01/01/70 00:00      
   Why not use QBASIC?            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Why not use QBASIC?            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Why not use QBASIC?            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Why not use QBASIC?            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Why not use QBASIC?            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: TurboPower AsyncPro            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Why not use QBASIC?            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Why not use QBASIC?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Why not use QBASIC?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RE: Why not use QBASIC?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Want the 50 mili second loop code            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Why not use QBASIC?            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Why not use QBASIC?            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Why not use QBASIC?            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Why not use QBASIC?            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Why not use QBASIC?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Why not use QBASIC?            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Why not use QBASIC?            01/01/70 00:00      
         Basic is for kids?            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Basic is for kids?            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Basic is for kids?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Basic is for kids?            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: URGENT: serial comuinication 8051            01/01/70 00:00      
      URGENT: serial comuinication 8051! help            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: URGENT: serial comuinication 8051! help            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List