| ??? 12/30/03 22:27 Read: times |
#61630 - RE: Atomic 16bit read Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Thanks. Very interesting idea (*why haven't I thought of it?* - possibly because of deadly fear of any more bloat in the counter code - needs to be lean and mean) but i'll probably just go with pulses - they should definitely suffice... if I can filter out all the junk people scare me with... |



