Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
01/02/04 22:04
Read: times


 
#61792 - RE: Atomic 16bit read
Responding to: ???'s previous message
@Erik,

"Thus the use of a CPLD that can keep up with the oscillations"


sorry, but I can't understand, how a CPLD can give me an error below one step ?

If I would use a CPLD I would do exact the same as my software. I would use four FFs which latch the actual and the previous state followed by a logic, which decode the state to an increment or decrement signal for a counter.

The only difference, the CPLD can be clocked with e.g. 50MHz instead 50kHz of the software sample interval.

But again the error was still the same: one digit.

Thus the step rate of an encoder was designed in such a way, that an error of one can be accepted.
And thus it plays no role, if on the point of the oscillation the last or the actual step value was accepted.

I have also seen on our device oscillations, e.g. of exact 100Hz, caused by mechanical oscillation of a big transformer nearby.
But this was only internal, since the displayed position accuracy was above one step.


I know there exist position encoders, which deliver two analog voltages and then also step rates below one can be measured.


Peter


List of 32 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Atomic 16bit read            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Atomic 16bit read            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Atomic 16bit read            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Atomic 16bit read            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Atomic 16bit read            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Atomic 16bit read            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Atomic 16bit read            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Atomic 16bit read            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Atomic 16bit read            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Atomic 16bit read            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Atomic 16bit read            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Atomic 16bit read            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Atomic 16bit read            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Atomic 16bit read            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Atomic 16bit read            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RE: Atomic 16bit read            01/01/70 00:00      
                        RE: Atomic 16bit read            01/01/70 00:00      
                           RE: Atomic 16bit read            01/01/70 00:00      
                              RE: Atomic 16bit read            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 RE: Atomic 16bit read            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    RE: Atomic 16bit read            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       RE: Atomic 16bit read            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          RE: Atomic 16bit read            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             RE: Atomic 16bit read            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                RE: Atomic 16bit read            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Atomic 16bit read            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Atomic 16bit read            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Atomic 16bit read            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Atomic 16bit read            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Atomic 16bit read            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Atomic 16bit read            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Atomic 16bit read            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List