| ??? 01/19/04 14:46 Read: times |
#62883 - RE: Deep sea application Responding to: ???'s previous message |
My very many thanks to the enormously talented and informative individuals who have offered their kind anaswer to my questions.
As far as my comments about "bigger = better", sigh... that was supposed to be "bigger != better". A stupid typo on my part but in retrospect I'm glad that I made it. It encouraged you to offer a clear and detailed explanation of why bigger does not = better. Thanks to all once again! Steve C. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Deep sea application | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Deep sea application | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Deep sea application | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Deep sea application | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Deep sea application | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Deep sea application | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Deep sea application | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Deep sea application | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Deep sea application | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Deep sea application | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Deep sea application | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Deep sea application | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Spoken like a true engineer! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Spoken like a true engineer! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Spoken like a true engineer! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Deep sea application | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Deep sea application | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Deep sea application | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Deep sea application | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Deep sea application | 01/01/70 00:00 |



