??? 03/13/04 23:04 Read: times |
#66670 - Borland: Windows-specific? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Joseph Hebert said:
a compiler that is specific to the Windows OS.
Is it actually specific to Windows, or just specific to x86-based targets? Can you confirm that the code generated by the Borland v5.5 C++ Compiler alone (ie, without all the C++ Builder stuff) definitely relies upon Windows? As I noted earlier, older versions of the Borland Compiler used to be able to generate pure x86 code without PC, MS-DOS, or Windows dependency - so you could use them for x86 embedded development. |
Topic | Author | Date |
XP C compiler? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: XP C compiler? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: XP C compiler? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: XP C compiler? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: XP C compiler? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Borland: Windows-specific? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Borland: Windows-specific? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Borland: Windows-specific? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Compiler only - no GUI. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Compiler only - no GUI. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Compiler only - no GUI. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Compiler only - no GUI. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
my mistake! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Compiler only - no GUI. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Glossary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Glossary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SDCC C compiler & 89S8252 boards | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Powersoft | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Compiler from Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
STOP! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I\'ve never learnt C... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks, | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
A Good book![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |