??? 03/14/04 08:44 Read: times |
#66687 - RE: Borland: Windows-specific? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
You're quite correct, of course. Actually, it was a qustion - not a statement of fact! I don't know whether this particular version of the Borland compiler is Windows-specific or not, and I haven't had cause to investigate it (yet). But I have heard it said elsewhere. Also, my C++ Builder v5 seems to be missing some essentials - like the 'interrupt' keyword extension... |
Topic | Author | Date |
XP C compiler? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: XP C compiler? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: XP C compiler? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: XP C compiler? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: XP C compiler? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Borland: Windows-specific? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Borland: Windows-specific? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Borland: Windows-specific? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Compiler only - no GUI. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Compiler only - no GUI. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Compiler only - no GUI. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Compiler only - no GUI. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
my mistake! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Compiler only - no GUI. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Glossary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Glossary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SDCC C compiler & 89S8252 boards | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Powersoft | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Compiler from Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
STOP! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I\'ve never learnt C... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks, | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
A Good book![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |