??? 04/15/04 22:21 Read: times |
#68590 - RE: non-standard baud rate Responding to: ???'s previous message |
1) Well, it appears that the solution will involve building a converter box that has two processors running at different crystal frequencies, with either a SPI or parallel interface between them.
2) I would like to look into the possibility of using the USB port instead of the COM port. 1) That is silly, use a two UART '51 chip, there are several of them available see http://www.keil.com/dd/parm_search.asp 2) possibly a very good idea, check appnotes etc at Cypress. Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
non-standard baud rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: non-standard baud rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: non-standard baud rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: non-standard baud rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: non-standard baud rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: non-standard baud rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: non-standard baud rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: non-standard baud rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: non-standard baud rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: non-standard baud rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: non-standard baud rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: non-standard baud rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: non-standard baud rate![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: non-standard baud rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: non-standard baud rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: non-standard baud rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: non-standard baud rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: non-standard baud rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: non-standard baud rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
non-standard baud rate - no problem | 01/01/70 00:00 |