??? 04/19/04 17:57 Read: times |
#68818 - RE: non-standard baud rate Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik:
In order to support the 93,750 baud system without slowing things down, I would need to convert to the next highest standard rate, which is 115,200 baud. I have been unable to find a single crystal frequency that will support both 93,750 and 115k. At 12 MHz, 16 MHz and 11.0592 MHz, the round-off in the timer reload value calculations leads to much more than the 2% baud frequency error recommended by Intel for reliable communication. That is why I agreed with the other posters that two processors are needed. Of course, if there is a way to do it with a single processor, that would be preferable. I will check at Cypress for USB app. notes. Thanks for the suggestion. Carroll |
Topic | Author | Date |
non-standard baud rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: non-standard baud rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: non-standard baud rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: non-standard baud rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: non-standard baud rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: non-standard baud rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: non-standard baud rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: non-standard baud rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: non-standard baud rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: non-standard baud rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: non-standard baud rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: non-standard baud rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: non-standard baud rate![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: non-standard baud rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: non-standard baud rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: non-standard baud rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: non-standard baud rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: non-standard baud rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: non-standard baud rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
non-standard baud rate - no problem | 01/01/70 00:00 |