??? 04/19/04 14:01 Read: times |
#68777 - RE: GAL Programming Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Freiends the porblem in making the programmer
Exactly. Every thread about kitchen table programmers have the same: "this look good, but I can not make it work". If it is low volume the slight added cost of using a CPLD should not matter, if high volume, the cost oa an industrial programmer should not matter. Ergo, there is no reason whatsoever not to use a JTAG chip. Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
GAL Programming | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: GAL Programming | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: GAL Programming | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: GAL Programming | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: GAL Programming | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: GAL Programming | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: GAL Programming | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: GAL Programming | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: GAL Programming | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Glue | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Glue | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: GAL Programming | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: GAL Programming | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: GAL Programming | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: GAL Programming | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: GAL Programming | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: GAL Programming | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: GAL Programming | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: GAL Programming | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: GAL Programming![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |