Twice you've referred to something you call the "second Gulf War." There has been only one Gulf War. One wherein we waited for over a decade for Saddam to honor his commitments from the cease fire. But alas, there were too many leaders in too many of those so-called united nations getting too rich on the oil-for-food program to ever hope that anything would be finished. After all, all they had to do was conspire with Saddam to keep him in power, to keep the mass graves and rape rooms full, and they got lots of money. But that's another issue.

I'm not sure why, since you've so deliberately ignored everything I said in my last post, but I will try to make one final point about your so-called "peace loving" Muslims. Ask them why they are Muslim. Ask them to explain why they believe as they do. Ask them, for that matter, exactly what it is that they do believe. Do they actually believe that Muhammed is God's prophet? If so, then why aren't they taking up arms to kill the infidels? And if they don't believe they should, ask them why do they not believe what Muhammed wrote down for them, him being God's prophet and all? Ask them why, if they're just going to make up what they want anyway, why would they choose to base their own beliefs on a religion so steeped in the doctrine of murder and hate? Make no mistake. There is no room in the Koran for gray area. If they do not believe that their divine responsibility is to kill all the infidels, then they believe that Muhammed was lying and that is diametric to their claim that he was God's prophet. Make no mistake. Tolerance is anathema to Islam. The concept of "peace loving," applied to diversity of thought and belief, is anathema to Islam. Again, the salient point is this. For a peace loving person to subscribe to Islam, for a tolerant person to be Muslim, is like a civil rights advocate joining the Ku Klux Klan. They are decieving someone, either you or themselves.