??? 05/15/04 00:53 Read: times |
#70378 - RE: ThermoCouple K -> Digital Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Hallo Richard,
have a look at datasheets from OP113, OP291 and OP295. There you will find alternative designs, providing some lower precision. If you put an OP07 into these circuits, operating at power supply voltage of at least +-5V, then you even can keep costs minimal. In any case, cable to K-type thermocouple should be twisted like twisted pair cable and should be shielded. Connect shield to 0V of circuit. Keep length of cable to absolute minimum. Kai |
Topic | Author | Date |
ThermoCouple K -> Digital | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: ThermoCouple K -> Digital | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: ThermoCouple K -> Digital | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: ThermoCouple K -> Digital | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: ThermoCouple K -> Digital | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: ThermoCouple K -> Digital | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: ThermoCouple K -> Digital | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: ThermoCouple K -> Digital | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: ThermoCouple K -> Digital | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: ThermoCouple K -> Digital | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: ThermoCouple K -> Digital | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: ThermoCouple K -> Digital![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
A 4. thermo connection is not needed! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: ThermoCouple K -> Digital | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: ThermoCouple K -> Digital | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: ThermoCouple K -> Digital | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: ThermoCouple K -> Digital | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: ThermoCouple K -> Digital | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: ThermoCouple K -> Digital | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: ThermoCouple K -> Digital | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: ThermoCouple K -> Digital | 01/01/70 00:00 |