| ??? 07/14/04 20:23 Read: times |
#74261 - RE: processor choice Responding to: ???'s previous message |
phillip m gallo said:
It could be that the addressing requirements may argue for a different processor choice.
After considering this, you might calculate what you hard disk bandwidth requirements are ... does your intended micro have the ability to sustain this transaction rate? It certainly sounds to me like an 8051 is not a good choice for this job: http://www.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=74257 |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 16bit ram access | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 16bit ram access | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 16bit ram access | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 16bit ram access | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 16bit ram access | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 16bit ram access | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Wrong approach? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Wrong approach? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Wrong approach? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 16bit ram access | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 16bit ram access | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 16bit ram access | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 16bit ram access | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: processor choice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: processor choice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: processor choice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Poject | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Now off-topic | 01/01/70 00:00 |