| ??? 07/14/04 22:40 Read: times |
#74266 - RE: processor choice Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I said:
It certainly sounds to me like an 8051 is not a good choice for this job erik malund said:
since he suggested two uCs I will rephrase:
It certainly sounds to me like an 8 bit processor is not a good choice for this job. Quite so: http://www.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=74257 |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 16bit ram access | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 16bit ram access | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 16bit ram access | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 16bit ram access | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 16bit ram access | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 16bit ram access | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Wrong approach? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Wrong approach? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Wrong approach? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 16bit ram access | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 16bit ram access | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 16bit ram access | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 16bit ram access | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: processor choice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: processor choice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: processor choice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Poject | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Now off-topic | 01/01/70 00:00 |