| ??? 12/20/04 06:19 Read: times |
#83477 - s51 is good Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Dear Shivani Saini ,
thanks for your suggestion , but it is about a 2 year or so that i have been using AT89S5x series instead of the AT89C5x series , and i will never revert back ,mainly because of benefits from S Series. but anyway your suggestion is a good idea to see wether the problem relates to this typical chip or not, so if i will find my AT89C5x programmer still working give it a try and let everyone here know the result. and about the kuldeep's problem , i was reading that post , his board do work with C51 ,but he doesn't mentioned anywhere that he has problems with pull up/down(s) ? |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| invalid voltage on a pulled up/down Port | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| replace s with c | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thats not the solution. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| please follow the main problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| and some news | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| s51 is good | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Pullup/down | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sorry for Echo. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| pull up/downs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| pullup+pulldown = potential-divider? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Potential, potential divider? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| potential divider / where wires go | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| blow it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| don't blowed it (atleast not untill now) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| where does the wires go | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| To Erik and others | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| This will not work with 'C51s | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Exactly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| just got the point :) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| And finally the problem solved! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I meant ++hundreds of microampere++ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Wrong question ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Negative Logic? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, negative logic! | 01/01/70 00:00 |