??? 01/06/05 15:22 Read: times |
#84461 - Business spec ? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
If this is a business spec, anyone who isn't convinced by the argument that you can do everything they want in a single chip, perhaps even without a crystal, for a fraction of the price of your existing design, doesn't deserve to be in business...
If its some sort of academic exercise, then give me the name of the UK institution involved and I will ring the appropriate idiots and berate them. The design you have is not representative of good practice. It WILL emit more scruff than a modern design for a start, and will be commensurately harder to screen and more sensitive to its EM environment. Steve |
Topic | Author | Date |
Worst case design | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
bible time | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What about an example? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
loading analysis | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Laoding Analysis | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
AC "loading" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
AC analysis | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
AC loading | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Andy forgot | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not so much | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
How to post a schematic - Tutorial | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Analysis... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Schematic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
new url | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Link | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Third time lucky | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the link | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Oh dear... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Clock Freq. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
old school | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ADC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
1997 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Design Practices | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
for the sake of it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
living in the past | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Old Design practice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Call My Bluff? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
true meaning of "Worst-Case" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Are you sure?![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Business spec ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
UniS? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Naw | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ya | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Try this | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
can not answer | 01/01/70 00:00 |