| ??? 01/08/05 19:30 Read: times |
#84586 - In-System v. In-Application Programming Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Note that In-Application Programming (IAP) is not the same as In-System Programming (ISP).
http://www.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=73013 http://www.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=67124 What Darek has described is IAP. You need an ISP part to do IAP, but there's a lot more to IAP than just ISP! |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Use SRAM as code memory. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| thanks for answer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ibid | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| There are so many options... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Answer partially wrong: Can't Write CODE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No need for switching | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oh yes... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Take care - wherewer your code is :-) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Once again thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Self-modifying code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Self-modifying code - good or bad | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Self-modifying code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 90:10 rule | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| In System Programming Application Note | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| In-System v. In-Application Programming | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| IAP v ISP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Philips IAP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It's easier with Atmel | 01/01/70 00:00 |