| ??? 01/09/05 00:57 Read: times |
#84595 - IAP v ISP Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Hi Andy,
Indeed, there is a difference between ISP and IAP. And Atmel includes their API (Application Program Interface) routines in the bootloader. Really, there aren't that many of them. It wouldn't take more than a couple or few hours to read up on them. Anyway, that's the point of the bootloader application note. Personally I think using the Atmel part, with the built-in FLASH and the bootloader with the API routines already there, would be a whole lot easier than the machinations he (Darek) seems to be describing. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Use SRAM as code memory. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| thanks for answer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ibid | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| There are so many options... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Answer partially wrong: Can't Write CODE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No need for switching | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oh yes... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Take care - wherewer your code is :-) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Once again thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Self-modifying code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Self-modifying code - good or bad | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Self-modifying code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 90:10 rule | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| In System Programming Application Note | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| In-System v. In-Application Programming | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| IAP v ISP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Philips IAP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It's easier with Atmel | 01/01/70 00:00 |