??? 01/31/05 20:25 Read: times |
#86238 - UART is not a good choice Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Stephen Harris said:
... but heres the link ... And that product's datasheet, in the typical application section, refers to another datasheet for an encoder/decoder chipset that uses Manchester for its balanced code. Thus you can infer that the RF link 'likes' a DC-balanced encoding scheme and thus an MCU's UART is not a good choice. You'll probably want to consider bit-banging a Manchester or 4B/5B coding scheme. |
Topic | Author | Date |
P1 serial data | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why not use the UART? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Pin 10 and 11 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
back to basics | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
will cost you anyhow | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Already Have | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What kind od serial data | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Type of data | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RTFM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Wrong end of stick! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Serial | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
still unspecific | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ROM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
a ROM can not map anything | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
End of wrong stick! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Mystery? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
its still a mystery | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Module | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not yet | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
UART is not a good choice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Manchester | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You didn't get it, but that's OK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The Stick! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Extra UART needed? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Wires? Grounding?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
uC to RF module interface wires | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
disconnect the MAX232 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It looks like a straight tranceiver![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |