| ??? 02/24/05 08:42 Read: times |
#88286 - *ALL* Compilers! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Lee Kien said:
i'm trying to use Timer 2, but it seems that my compiler can't understand/recognise what is T2CON, TR2, ET2, etc. I'm using MCS-51 asembler and linker. That's an Assembler - not a Compiler! A Compiler compiles high-level source code (eg, 'C'); An Assembler assembles low-level assembly source code. That's why it's called "MCS-51 asembler" - not "MCS-51 Compiler" Anyhow, any 8051 Assembler or Compiler will support Timer 2 - or any other peripheral, for that matter. This is because there are no special instructions involved in using Timer 2; or any other peripheral, for that matter - it's just a matter of writing the right value(s) to the right SFR(s). Your problem is in assuming that your tools will automatically see the symbols T2CON, TR2, ET2, etc and just "know" that these are SFR addresses - this is not necessarily the case! You need to read your Manuals to find if there are any predefined SFR symbols. You may need to use a command-line option, or an Include File |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Which Compiler supports Timer 2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| do by hands | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Keil? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Alternative | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| indeed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nothhing to do with Modern! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| then maybe "user's friendly"? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| (in)Convenience | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| right | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ah yes... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| workaround? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hands | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| *ALL* Compilers! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re:Which Compiler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sure, but why - and it is risky | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SFR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| agreed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a plethora of derivatives | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| more on Keil asm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Keil - NOMOD51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| define it | 01/01/70 00:00 |