| ??? 02/24/05 13:59 Read: times |
#88331 - a plethora of derivatives Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Assuming that ANY assembler or compiler "understand" ANY SFR name is a faulty assumption.
The "proof" of that being a "faulty assumption" could be that the RD2 and the 668 have SFRs of identical names with different addresses. So, I would, almost, state that the fact that Keil include the "standard" '51 SFR defs is an error. The include of a derivative dependent .h/.inc file should be mandatory. I would guess that the existence of the default defs comes from the olden days when it was known that no more SFRs were ever to be added to the '51 - register that under "famous last words". Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Which Compiler supports Timer 2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| do by hands | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Keil? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Alternative | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| indeed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nothhing to do with Modern! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| then maybe "user's friendly"? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| (in)Convenience | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| right | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ah yes... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| workaround? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hands | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| *ALL* Compilers! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re:Which Compiler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sure, but why - and it is risky | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SFR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| agreed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a plethora of derivatives | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| more on Keil asm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Keil - NOMOD51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| define it | 01/01/70 00:00 |