| ??? 02/24/05 14:41 Read: times |
#88340 - sure, but why - and it is risky Responding to: ???'s previous message |
you can compile your code with timer 2
troght direct SFR addressing mode ORL 0C8H,#00000100B ;T2CON SFR ADDRESS Of course, you can, but why not just include the correct SFR definition file (whatever your brand of assembler/compiler calls them) Another aspect is, that while it is unlikely that any new derivative will have different SFR addresses for T2, using absolute addresses should be discouraged in all cases. A small side effect of this is the possible unpleasantness that could arise from the assembler/compiler not "knowing" that something is a SFR (e.g. Keil has the 'sfr' data type) Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Which Compiler supports Timer 2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| do by hands | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Keil? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Alternative | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| indeed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nothhing to do with Modern! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| then maybe "user's friendly"? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| (in)Convenience | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| right | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ah yes... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| workaround? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hands | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| *ALL* Compilers! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re:Which Compiler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sure, but why - and it is risky | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SFR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| agreed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a plethora of derivatives | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| more on Keil asm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Keil - NOMOD51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| define it | 01/01/70 00:00 |