| ??? 02/24/05 15:20 Read: times |
#88348 - agreed Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Surely, that could never arise with an Assembler
Correct. The .h file is used by both assembler and C and I did not mentally edit out assembler. Anyhow, ignoring the "small side effect" which isn't there with assembler, the statement "using absolute addresses should be discouraged in all cases" is still valid. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Which Compiler supports Timer 2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| do by hands | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Keil? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Alternative | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| indeed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nothhing to do with Modern! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| then maybe "user's friendly"? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| (in)Convenience | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| right | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ah yes... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| workaround? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hands | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| *ALL* Compilers! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re:Which Compiler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sure, but why - and it is risky | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SFR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| agreed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a plethora of derivatives | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| more on Keil asm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Keil - NOMOD51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| define it | 01/01/70 00:00 |