| ??? 02/24/05 11:34 Read: times |
#88307 - Ah yes... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Oleg Sergeev said:
I feel not good when try to imagine how could I do my current "whizziest" projects in that pure old 2500 A.D. 8051 Macro Assembler. Erhm That, of course, is another matter...! ;-) Just because it can be done doesn't necessarily mean that you'll want to do it! |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Which Compiler supports Timer 2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| do by hands | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Keil? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Alternative | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| indeed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nothhing to do with Modern! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| then maybe "user's friendly"? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| (in)Convenience | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| right | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ah yes... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| workaround? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hands | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| *ALL* Compilers! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re:Which Compiler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sure, but why - and it is risky | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SFR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| agreed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a plethora of derivatives | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| more on Keil asm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Keil - NOMOD51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| define it | 01/01/70 00:00 |